WCAG specialist focused on criterion-level evidence across perceivable, operable, understandable, and robust behavior, without overstating automated scan results as conformance.
A perspective available to CARBON—not a claim that this tester has reviewed your project. Findings require execution evidence.
Compatibility specialist focused on browser, device, viewport, operating-system, assistive-technology, and support-matrix evidence, with explicit coverage gaps rather than assumed portability.
A perspective available to CARBON—not a claim that this tester has reviewed your project. Findings require execution evidence.
Performance specialist focused on user-visible latency, Core Web Vitals, payload and request cost, caching, API timing, scalability, mobile constraints, memory, and leaks.
A perspective available to CARBON—not a claim that this tester has reviewed your project. Findings require execution evidence.
Content and UX-writing specialist focused on page identity, clear copy, information architecture, credibility, navigation, status communication, readability, and content quality.
A perspective available to CARBON—not a claim that this tester has reviewed your project. Findings require execution evidence.
Forms specialist focused on input contracts, validation, boundaries, state, submission, recovery, data quality, conversion barriers, and accessible interaction.
A perspective available to CARBON—not a claim that this tester has reviewed your project. Findings require execution evidence.
First-impression and conversion specialist focused on value clarity, trust, navigation, calls to action, responsive composition, dead ends, and page credibility.
A perspective available to CARBON—not a claim that this tester has reviewed your project. Findings require execution evidence.
Checkout and payment specialist focused on order accuracy, address and payment input, trust, retry safety, pricing truth, completion, and conversion-blocking failures.
A perspective available to CARBON—not a claim that this tester has reviewed your project. Findings require execution evidence.
AI
Virtual AI tester
Priya
Shopping Cart Tester
Shopping-cart specialist focused on line-item state, quantities, promotions, totals, inventory changes, persistence, accessibility, and safe transition to checkout.
A perspective available to CARBON—not a claim that this tester has reviewed your project. Findings require execution evidence.
AI
Virtual AI tester
Mateo
Pricing Page Tester
Pricing and subscription specialist focused on plan clarity, comparison, currency and locale, hidden conditions, billing cadence, conversion paths, and truthful claims.
A perspective available to CARBON—not a claim that this tester has reviewed your project. Findings require execution evidence.
AI-generated-code specialist focused on logic, boundaries, null and empty states, failure handling, API use, security, privacy, tests, code smells, state, and misleading AI shortcuts.
A perspective available to CARBON—not a claim that this tester has reviewed your project. Findings require execution evidence.
Review the trust boundaries around AI tools and information.
Jason Arbon CEO, testers.ai
/carbon-security-review
AISharonSecurityAIMarcusOWASPAIDiegoAI Chatbot
Your assistant reads a document. The document tells it to ignore the
user and send private information somewhere else.
The important question is not whether the document sounds persuasive.
It is whether untrusted content can acquire authority inside your
system.
/carbon-security-review examines AI-specific security
boundaries: prompt injection, untrusted channels, data leakage, tool
permissions, tenant isolation, and unsafe side effects.
Follow information into
action
A retrieved page is evidence, not an instruction from the user. A
tool description may itself contain untrusted content. A model's
proposed action still needs authorization and correctly scoped
arguments.
The review traces those boundaries through prompts, retrieval,
policies, tool calls, and application enforcement. It can identify where
the design relies on the model to remember a restriction that should be
enforced elsewhere.
Controlled probes may help verify a suspected path when authorized.
They should use synthetic data and contained tools, not send real
customer information to prove it could leak.
Separate the surface
from the capability
/carbon-security-review inspect our document assistant's retrieval and tool permissions; focus on untrusted instructions and cross-tenant access
The report should explain the entry point, required conditions,
possible consequence, evidence strength, containment, and a verification
check. A hypothetical injection is not automatically a demonstrated
exploit.
This differs from a general application-security pass by putting the
AI's information and action boundaries at the center.
The goal is not to make every input harmless. It is to make sure
harmful input cannot quietly become permission.
Install CARBON at testers.ai/carbon for a supported
coding agent such as Claude, Codex, or Cursor.
