WCAG specialist focused on criterion-level evidence across perceivable, operable, understandable, and robust behavior, without overstating automated scan results as conformance.
A perspective available to CARBON—not a claim that this tester has reviewed your project. Findings require execution evidence.
Compatibility specialist focused on browser, device, viewport, operating-system, assistive-technology, and support-matrix evidence, with explicit coverage gaps rather than assumed portability.
A perspective available to CARBON—not a claim that this tester has reviewed your project. Findings require execution evidence.
Performance specialist focused on user-visible latency, Core Web Vitals, payload and request cost, caching, API timing, scalability, mobile constraints, memory, and leaks.
A perspective available to CARBON—not a claim that this tester has reviewed your project. Findings require execution evidence.
Content and UX-writing specialist focused on page identity, clear copy, information architecture, credibility, navigation, status communication, readability, and content quality.
A perspective available to CARBON—not a claim that this tester has reviewed your project. Findings require execution evidence.
Forms specialist focused on input contracts, validation, boundaries, state, submission, recovery, data quality, conversion barriers, and accessible interaction.
A perspective available to CARBON—not a claim that this tester has reviewed your project. Findings require execution evidence.
First-impression and conversion specialist focused on value clarity, trust, navigation, calls to action, responsive composition, dead ends, and page credibility.
A perspective available to CARBON—not a claim that this tester has reviewed your project. Findings require execution evidence.
Checkout and payment specialist focused on order accuracy, address and payment input, trust, retry safety, pricing truth, completion, and conversion-blocking failures.
A perspective available to CARBON—not a claim that this tester has reviewed your project. Findings require execution evidence.
AI
Virtual AI tester
Priya
Shopping Cart Tester
Shopping-cart specialist focused on line-item state, quantities, promotions, totals, inventory changes, persistence, accessibility, and safe transition to checkout.
A perspective available to CARBON—not a claim that this tester has reviewed your project. Findings require execution evidence.
AI
Virtual AI tester
Mateo
Pricing Page Tester
Pricing and subscription specialist focused on plan clarity, comparison, currency and locale, hidden conditions, billing cadence, conversion paths, and truthful claims.
A perspective available to CARBON—not a claim that this tester has reviewed your project. Findings require execution evidence.
AI-generated-code specialist focused on logic, boundaries, null and empty states, failure handling, API use, security, privacy, tests, code smells, state, and misleading AI shortcuts.
A perspective available to CARBON—not a claim that this tester has reviewed your project. Findings require execution evidence.
Bring existing cases and issues into the agent’s field of view.
Jason Arbon CEO, testers.ai
/carbon-integrations
AIArjunData IntegrityAIJasonAI Code Review
The coding agent proposes a test. Your team wrote the same case two
years ago after a customer incident.
The agent was not necessarily careless. It may never have seen the
test management system where that knowledge lives.
/carbon-integrations connects available Jira, Xray, or
TestRail evidence to CARBON's project context: test cases, results, and
known issues that can improve planning and interpretation.
Read before creating another
copy
An old failure can reveal a boundary the current code makes hard to
notice. A manual case may capture a domain rule missing from the
specification. A recent result may also be stale or belong to another
environment.
The useful integration preserves that provenance rather than turning
every imported status into a current pass. External evidence informs the
investigation; it does not exempt the new build from testing.
Keep synchronization
deliberate
/carbon-integrations connect the project's TestRail context read-only and identify relevant existing cases for checkout
Connection information belongs in the configuration path, not public
reports or chat text. Read-only is the default. Writing new cases or
issues back requires an explicit request, a preview of the proposed
changes, the required confirmation, and backup awareness. Deletion is
not a routine synchronization step.
The report should explain what was accessible, what was used, and
which gaps remain. A configured endpoint is not proof that a query
succeeded.
AI testing becomes more useful when it can learn from the
organization's actual history. It should not make the team choose
between that history and a new testing workflow.
Install CARBON at testers.ai/carbon for a supported
coding agent such as Claude, Codex, or Cursor.
