/carbon-load
Inspect code and server/deployment configuration read-only for likely load failure points, assess readiness, record approved browser journeys and generate replay workloads. Run staged load only after explicit target/traffic approval; distinguish static risk hypotheses from measured failures.
When to use it
You need load readiness or a controlled capacity investigation.
Before you start
Start with source/configuration assessment. A URL alone does not authorize traffic. Approve the exact target, journey capture, traffic shape, limits and abort conditions before staged load execution.
Try this in your coding agent.
/carbon-load Review the search API code and configuration for load risks; do not generate traffic.Replace sample paths with your project. Slash names are shorthand; your host may use a plugin prefix or a skill picker. Invocation help →
ILLUSTRATIVE WALKTHROUGH
Search API load-risk review
An expanded teaching example, not a recorded or live execution. The report stays visible while the replay explains how to read it.
- 01Read context
- 02Analyze
- 03Show evidence
- 04Report
Coding-agent conversation
Example report
Illustration
TestBucks course screen with illustrative analysis. The screenshot supplies context; the demo does not establish a newly observed bug.
- Query intent
- Catalog / processing
- Visible result
Illustrated outcome
Unbounded results and a missing query index create a scaling risk.
Evidence to inspect
Read source and configuration: no pagination limit; query scans product records.
Still untested / not established
Read-only review: no load is generated and capacity is not measured.
Ready. Read the full example or play its steps.
What a useful result contains
A bounded claim
For search api load-risk review, state the target, revision, environment and actual work performed. Keep planned, executed, blocked and untested work separate.
An inspectable trail
Read source and configuration: no pagination limit; query scans product records. In a real run, retain the source, trace, screenshot or fixture behind the conclusion.
The qualification
Read-only review: no load is generated and capacity is not measured.
The next decision
Decide whether the evidence calls for a focused check, a reviewed fix or more context. Do not convert a plausible example into a verified finding.
Adapt the example to your project
- Replace search api load-risk review with a real feature, path or decision in your project.
- State the expected rule and its source. Include safe fixtures, constraints and a budget where appropriate.
- Ask for exact evidence and remaining gaps. Approve consequential actions separately.
/jay Review the /carbon-load result. Separate observed evidence, assumptions and untested scope, then recommend the next useful check.Where to go next
/carbon-performance →/carbon-stress →Content checked against the local command definition: skills/carbon-load/SKILL.md. Examples adapted from the homepage’s TestBucks walkthroughs. Availability is edition- and host-dependent.