/carbon-geo
Evaluate GEO (generative engine optimization) and AI-search SEO for a webpage or site: crawl/indexing eligibility, answer usefulness, entity and source credibility, structured-data truth, and evidence-qualified AI citations or visibility. Produce prioritized fixes and a branded GEO report; use carbon-agentic instead for agents operating UI or APIs.
When to use it
You want to improve the evidence a search or answer system can find.
Before you start
Inspect crawl eligibility, semantic text, entity clarity, source credibility and structured-data truth. Separate observed citations from readiness suggestions; do not promise rankings.
Try this in your coding agent.
/carbon-geo Review the public product page for clear AI-search discovery and source attribution.Replace sample paths with your project. Slash names are shorthand; your host may use a plugin prefix or a skill picker. Invocation help →
ILLUSTRATIVE WALKTHROUGH
Product discovery
An expanded teaching example, not a recorded or live execution. The report stays visible while the replay explains how to read it.
- 01Read context
- 02Investigate
- 03Show evidence
- 04Report
Coding-agent conversation
Example report
Illustration
TestBucks course screen with illustrative analysis. The screenshot supplies context; the demo does not establish a newly observed bug.
- User intent
- Visible content
- Meaning / consistency
Illustrated outcome
Key product facts are absent from crawlable page text.
Evidence to inspect
Rendered page vs semantic document: pricing and supported hosts only inside a graphic.
Still untested / not established
No guaranteed search ranking or AI citation.
Ready. Read the full example or play its steps.
What a useful result contains
A bounded claim
For product discovery, state the target, revision, environment and actual work performed. Keep planned, executed, blocked and untested work separate.
An inspectable trail
Rendered page vs semantic document: pricing and supported hosts only inside a graphic. In a real run, retain the source, trace, screenshot or fixture behind the conclusion.
The qualification
No guaranteed search ranking or AI citation.
The next decision
Decide whether the evidence calls for a focused check, a reviewed fix or more context. Do not convert a plausible example into a verified finding.
Adapt the example to your project
- Replace product discovery with a real feature, path or decision in your project.
- State the expected rule and its source. Include safe fixtures, constraints and a budget where appropriate.
- Ask for exact evidence and remaining gaps. Approve consequential actions separately.
/jay Review the /carbon-geo result. Separate observed evidence, assumptions and untested scope, then recommend the next useful check.Where to go next
/carbon-content →/carbon-agentic →Content checked against the local command definition: skills/carbon-geo/SKILL.md. Examples adapted from the homepage’s TestBucks walkthroughs. Availability is edition- and host-dependent.