Venture Capital — Category Report
47 firms analyzed · 1066 total issues detected
Powered by Testers.AI
View Competitive Grid → View Demo →
B+89%
Category Avg Score
47
Sites
1066
Total Issues
22.7
Avg Issues
47
With Issues
39 Critical480 High534 Medium13 Low
Testers.AI
>_ Testers.AI AI Analysis

I analyzed 47 venture capital firm websites and detected 1066 total quality issues. The average quality score is 88.8% (B+), with 22.7 issues per site on average.

The biggest issue categories across the category: UX (873), Content (411), Visual (362). The most recurring specific problems I found: "inconsistent heading hierarchy and semantic structure" (found on 6 sites); "insufficient color contrast in footer text" (found on 3 sites); "low contrast text on dark background reduces readability" (found on 3 sites).

Top performers: Thrive Capital, Fuse Ventures, Founders Co-op (under 15 issues each). Sites needing the most work: IVP, NEA, Intel Capital (35+ issues each). The gap between best and worst is significant — the cleanest sites have 1 issues while the roughest have 59, suggesting very different levels of QA investment.

Quality Analysis
Qualitative Quality
Category Avg
Best
Worst
Issue Count by Type
UX
873
A11y
449
Content
410
Visual
361
Other
112
Security
10
Legal
2
Quality Quadrant · User Experience vs Issue Count
Low Quality · Few Issues
High Quality · Few Issues
Low Quality · Many Issues
High Quality · Many Issues
Pages Tested · 717 screenshots across 47 sites
Rankings — Sites with Detected Issues (47)
#1
Fuse Ventures
A 96%
2 issues
#2
Founders Co-op
A 95%
2 issues
#3
Costanoa Ventures
A 94%
2 issues
#4
Social Capital
A 94%
2 issues
#5
Spark Capital
A 93%
8 issues
#6
Founders Fund
A- 92%
9 issues
#7
Y Combinator
A- 92%
17 issues
#8
GV (Google Ventures)
A- 92%
18 issues
#9
Uncorkcapital
A- 91%
13 issues
#10
Zetta Venture Partners
A- 91%
14 issues
#11
Tiger Global
A- 91%
15 issues
#12
Initialized Capital
A- 90%
15 issues
#13
Flying Fish Ventures
A- 90%
16 issues
#14
Wing Venture Capital
A- 90%
17 issues
#15
Bessemer Venture Partners
A- 90%
20 issues
#16
Andreessen Horowitz (a16z)
A- 90%
18 issues
#17
Battery Ventures
A- 90%
18 issues
#18
Basis Set Ventures
A- 90%
24 issues
#19
Salesforce Ventures
A- 90%
19 issues
#20
Thrive Capital
B+ 89%
1 issues
#21
General Catalyst
B+ 89%
21 issues
#22
Innovation Endeavors
B+ 89%
21 issues
#23
Craft Ventures
B+ 89%
21 issues
#24
Coatue Management
B+ 89%
22 issues
#25
M12 (Microsoft)
B+ 89%
22 issues
#26
Greylock Partners
B+ 89%
22 issues
#27
Lux Capital
B+ 89%
22 issues
#28
Index Ventures
B+ 89%
24 issues
#29
Pioneer Square Labs
B+ 88%
21 issues
#30
First Round Capital
B+ 88%
25 issues
#31
Felicis Ventures
B+ 88%
26 issues
#32
SignalFire
B+ 88%
28 issues
#33
Menlo Ventures
B+ 88%
27 issues
#34
Madrona
B+ 87%
28 issues
#35
Khosla Ventures
B+ 87%
34 issues
#36
Accel
B+ 87%
35 issues
#37
Sequoia Capital
B+ 87%
30 issues
#38
Redpoint Ventures
B+ 87%
30 issues
#39
Kleiner Perkins
B 86%
14 issues
#40
Amplify Partners
B 86%
32 issues
#41
CRV
B 86%
34 issues
#42
Boldstart Ventures
B 85%
37 issues
#43
Radical Ventures
B 85%
37 issues
#44
Insight Partners
B 84%
41 issues
#45
Intel Capital
B 83%
45 issues
#46
NEA
B- 80%
58 issues
#47
IVP
B- 80%
59 issues
Generated by Testers.AI · VC Category Quality Scan